Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control

Hehn, Markus, Dr.

Markus Hehn

ETH Zürich
Dr. Markus Hehn
Inst.f. Dynamische Systeme u.
ML K 38
Sonneggstrasse 3
8092 Zürich

Phone: +41 44 632 92 72

Also see


Markus completed his doctoral studies with Professor Raffaello D'Andrea at the Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control, ETH Zürich (Switzerland). His research lies in the field of algorithms for the control of aerial vehicles, with a specific focus on exploiting the exceptional agility of the quadrotor vehicles that are used in the Flying Machine Arena. He is interested in understanding the physical limits of how quickly these vehicles can move, real-time trajectory generation algorithms that get close to these physical limits, the use of learning control methods to improve flight performance, and complex tasks that rely on the vehicle's agility (such as balancing an inverted pendulum on a quadrocopter).

He also contributed to the Flight Assembled Architecture project, for which he developed task-specific trajectory generation algorithms based on his previous work, worked on the robustness of the estimation algorithms to measurement data blackouts, and assisted with the implementation of a space reservation system that he had previously developed with Luzius Brodbeck.

Markus studied mechatronics at TU Darmstadt (Germany) and ETH Zürich (Switzerland) from 2003 to 2009, receiving a scholarship from Robert Bosch GmbH for his graduate studies. He has worked on optimizing the operating strategy of Diesel engines to reduce emissions and fuel consumption with Professor Lino Guzzella (as outlined in this paper), on the characterization of component load profiles for axle-split hybrid vehicle drivetrains at Robert Bosch GmbH (a system that has now been commercialized in the Peugeot 3008 HYbrid4), and on the performance development of V8 Formula One racing engines at Mercedes-Benz HighPerformanceEngines (evolutions of these engines powered the 2008 and 2009 Formula One World Drivers' Champions).

Research: Optimality-Based Quadrotor Flight Maneuvers

In the hands of a skilled pilot, a quadrocopter is an exceptionally agile flying machine. But what are the physical limits of their maneuverability, and how could these be attained in autonomous flight?

The dynamics of quadrocopters during rapid maneuvers are too complex for traditional control systems to cope with. While conventional control design techniques (e.g. PID control) allow the stable flight of quadrocopters, the flight performance is relatively low compared to the inherent capabilities of these vehicles. This is because strong assumptions are required to design the controllers: Typical designs are based on a simplified description of the system behavior (linearized models). While this is satisfactory at hover and low velocities, the descriptions do not correctly predict system behavior during fast maneuvers. In fact, most controllers are specifically designed for low velocities.

This research focuses on reducing the gap between autonomous flight performance and inherent capabilities of quadrocopters through novel control techniques for quadrotor flight controls. This should drastically increase the flight performance of quadrocopters while still providing stability. The research is carried out in the Flying Machine Arena and considers several aspects:

Physical Maneuverability Limits

Time-optimal maneuvers provide an absolute reference point that all other flight maneuvers can be compared to: They provide a lower bound on how quickly the quadrocopter vehicle is able to complete a maneuver based on its physical properties. This lower bound may then be used to benchmark the performance of other control strategies in order to determine their relative merits.

A tool has been developed in order to compute time-optimal two-dimensional maneuvers with arbitrary initial and final states [1]. Besides the possibility to benchmark other controllers, the tool also permits the evaluation of performance implications of quadrotor design parameters. For example, the effect of installing a larger or smaller battery can be quantified. The computed time-optimal maneuvers have also been verified experimentally:

While time-optimal maneuvers are a helpful tool when designing vehicles and controllers, the computational effort required to find them is too high to deploy such tools to guide quadrocopters in situations where the vehicle must be able to react to disturbances and a changing environment.

Real-Time Trajectory Generation and Control

When facing dynamic environments, changing objectives, or disturbances, the time available to plan and execute a maneuver does not suffice to compute time-optimal maneuvers. It is therefore necessary to find ways to simplify the maneuver computation on the fly. These simplified maneuvers should sacrifice as little as possible of the achievable performance.

A real-time trajectory generation algorithm, allowing the computation of trajectories from arbitrary initial states to a target position, has been presented [2]. This algorithm relies on approximations of the real quadrotor flight dynamics in order to simplify the trajectory generation problem. Using optimality conditions for the simplified model, it is possible to compute fast flight maneuvers at sub-millisecond computation times.

With the computation of flight maneuvers requiring significantly less than one millisecond, it becomes possible to dynamically react to disturbances or changing environments: When the vehicle deviates from its planned path, or when the objective changes, these changes can be incorporated in a new maneuver almost instantaneously. For example, it is possible to intercept a moving object (such as a ball) mid-air by continuously re-planning the maneuver as the vehicle moves and measurements of the ball flight path become available [3]:

This trajectory generation algorithm was also used in the Flight Assembled Architecture project, where the ability to efficiently compute trajectories was leveraged in order to plan flight paths and coordinate multiple vehicles through a space reservation system:

Optimality-Based Task Controller Design

In addition to the design of maneuvers for quadrotors in free flight, tasks involving the interaction of the vehicles with other objects and each other are investigated. The design of maneuvers and feedback control laws is based on a model-based approach and optimality conditions.

A control system permitting an inverted pendulum to be balanced on top of a quadrocopter has been designed [4]. Besides stabilizing the pendulum at hover, the system is also able to fly on circular trajectories, and follow set point changes:

In a further experimental setup, three quadrocopters are connected by a net and elastic strings. Using bang-bang and optimal control principles, trajectories and feedback control laws are designed for the fleet of quadrocopters [5]. These allow the system to toss a ball from the net into the air by rapidly stretching out the net, and then catch it again by executing a maneuver to the predicted impact point:

Learning-Based Performance Improvement

Even without external disturbances (such as wind gusts), the maneuver design and feedback control strategies presented above will not be able to achieve the full performance potential. One of the reasons for this is that typical control designs are fundamentally reactive: The maneuvers are planned based on mathematical models of the quadrocopter. In reality, however, the vehicle does not react exactly as predicted by these models. This leads to errors when executing a planned maneuver. These errors are measured, and an appropriate reaction is executed when a deviation from the desired maneuver is observed.

In order to prevent these errors from happening in the first place, the reactive control designs are augmented by a proactive component: When executing a maneuver repeatedly, it is possible to use knowledge from previous executions and a model to derive how repeated errors can be avoided. The research focus of this aspect is the efficient computation of such corrections for maneuvers.

Putting it All Together

The combination of real-time trajectory generation, optimality-based task controllers, and learning algorithms permits a dramatic performance improvement in quadrotor flight, enabling the execution of complex, precise, high-performance tasks. An experimental demonstration of such a task is the balancing, throwing, and catching of an inverted pendulum by quadrocopters [6]:


[1] Markus Hehn, Robin Ritz, and Raffaello D’Andrea. Performance Benchmarking of Quadrotor Systems Using Time-Optimal Control. Autonomous Robots, Volume 33, Numbers 1-2, 2012.

[2] Markus Hehn and Raffaello D'Andrea. Quadrocopter Trajectory Generation and Control. IFAC World Congress, 2011.

[3] Markus Hehn and Raffaello D'Andrea. Real-Time Trajectory Generation for Interception Maneuvers with Quadrocopters. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2012.

[4] Markus Hehn and Raffaello D'Andrea. A Flying Inverted Pendulum. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011.

[5] Robin Ritz, Mark W. Mueller, Markus Hehn, and Raffaello D'Andrea. Cooperative Quadrocopter Ball Throwing and Catching. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2012.

[6] Dario Brescianini, Markus Hehn, and Raffaello D'Andrea. Quadrocopter Pole Acrobatics. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2013.

Peer-Reviewed Publications

This list is also available at Google Scholar.


Wichtiger Hinweis:
Diese Website wird in älteren Versionen von Netscape ohne graphische Elemente dargestellt. Die Funktionalität der Website ist aber trotzdem gewährleistet. Wenn Sie diese Website regelmässig benutzen, empfehlen wir Ihnen, auf Ihrem Computer einen aktuellen Browser zu installieren. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf
folgender Seite.

Important Note:
The content in this site is accessible to any browser or Internet device, however, some graphics will display correctly only in the newer versions of Netscape. To get the most out of our site we suggest you upgrade to a newer browser.
More information

© 2014 ETH Zurich | Imprint | Disclaimer | 6 August 2014